Skip to content

Specialism / UX Consulting Agency

Consulting for the decision, not the deliverable.

Most UX consulting is bought when a team has run out of agreement. The useful output is not a recommendation. It is an evidenced account of the problem that survives scrutiny.

Who this page is for

For leadership teams who need to decide what to do before deciding who does it.

Related capability

  • Product strategy
  • Product discovery
  • User research
  • Market research
  • UX audits
  • Product audits
  • Customer journey mapping

01

The decisions we are usually brought in for

Rebuild or repair. Whether the product can support a new segment. Why a metric has moved and nothing explains it. Whether design should be centralised or federated. Whether a redesign that has been proposed is the right use of a year.

Each of these is a commercial decision with a design-shaped evidence gap in the middle. Our job is to close the gap quickly enough that the decision can be made properly.

02

Independence is the product

An internal team advocating for a structural change has to spend political capital to do it. An external team with no stake in the outcome can say the uncomfortable thing once, with evidence, and leave.

That is worth being explicit about: part of what a consulting engagement buys is the ability to state a finding without a career cost attached. We use it, including when the finding is that the work you were about to commission is not the work you need.

03

Consulting that leaves capability behind

We run audits as a method your team can repeat: the checklist, the severity model, the evidence sources and the working-session format. The second audit should not need us.

Where the finding is organisational. Two teams owning one journey, no agreed standard, no design ownership at leadership level. We say so plainly. Those are the findings that matter most and the ones most often softened into a design recommendation.

Signals

When this work is worth doing

If two or more of these are true, the conversation is probably overdue.

  • The team disagrees and cannot resolve itCompeting theories, no shared evidence, roadmap conversations that loop.
  • A large investment is about to be committedThe cheapest moment to test a plan is before it is funded.
  • Metrics moved and nothing explains itAnalytics show where; they rarely show why.
  • Experience quality varies by teamUsually a governance and ownership problem rather than a skill problem.

How we scope it

Three ways this usually runs

Durations are typical rather than fixed. We scope after the first conversation, not before.

  • Focused UX audit

    2 to 3 weeks

    One journey, evaluated in depth against behavioural evidence, heuristics and accessibility.

    You receive

    • Prioritised findings
    • Severity & impact matrix
    • Quick-win list
  • Full product audit

    4 to 6 weeks

    Whole-product diagnosis including usability testing, accessibility review and journey mapping.

    You receive

    • Root-cause analysis
    • Journey map
    • Sequenced remediation plan
  • Design strategy engagement

    6 to 10 weeks

    Experience strategy, design principles, operating model and the governance to sustain them.

    You receive

    • Experience strategy
    • Design principles
    • Operating model recommendations

UX Consulting Agency

Questions we hear before we start

Look at the product without the accumulated context that makes its oddities feel normal, and say things that carry a political cost internally. Independence and unfamiliarity are the actual assets, not superior skill.

Clients who trust us.

McKinsey & CompanyBCGAdobeSwiss ReiptiQQatar Islamic BankCrown Prince Court, Abu DhabiSpiceJetPanda CSSXebiaDettol
HPMongoDBGlassdoorNutellaNatarajMad Over DonutsLiveKitBazelHealing NexussDr. Divya AgrawalPenguin